Edld 5333 Week 1 Assignment 2015 Nfl

On By In 1
 

EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability 

Miguel LeijaEDLD 5333- 3/22/2010Week 5: Reflection

(ELCC 1.1 k-i, ii; 1.3 k-i, ii, iii; 1.4 k-Ii, ii, iii, iv; 2.1 k-i, s-i, ii, iii, iv; 3.4 k-i)Part 1: Site-Based Decision-Making

At the campus level, site-based decision making (SBDM) is a collaborative effort amongprofessional staff, parents, and community members to improve student achievement byaddressing the outcomes of all students and determining goals and strategies to ensureimprovement. Under state law, the Site-Based Decision-Making Committee establishes andreviews campus educational plans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroominstructional programs.Prior to completing this assignment, you will conduct two interviews—one with a member of theSite-Based Decision-Making Committee at your selected campus and the other with the campusprincipal. Your interview questions should address:

The committee’s makeup

The use of formal agendas

Topics typically discussed

Level of perceived teamwork (group dynamics)

Specific decision-making strategies

Conflict-resolution techniques

Part 2: Next Steps

As we stressed in this course, campus improvement is an ongoing, continuous process. When acampus receives its summative data reports, then the improvement cycle should begin againimmediately.In your second reflection, you will reflect on the action plan you developed earlier. Use thefollowing scenario to think about your action plan and how you can move that plan to another level.“Move forward in time to the end of the school year. Imagine that you and your staff implemented the action plan, which resulted in increased student performance on the latestAcademic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) reports. Your campus has moved a stepcloser to becoming Exemplary, and you want to maintain the momentum. What will you donow?”

Directions

Lamar University1 of 6

 

EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability 

Rubric

Use the following rubric to guide your work.

TasksAccomplishedProficientNeedsImprovementUnacceptableWeek 2 Assignment: Mining for Data (ELCC 2.2 a., b., c.; 2.3 a., c.)Part 1:CampusReportSummary

Conductsdetailedcomparison of scores in eachsubject,subgroup, andgrade level tothe standardsfor Acceptable,Recognized,and Exemplary.

(10 points)

Comparesscores in eachsubject,subgroup, andgrade level tothe standardsfor Acceptable,Recognized,and Exemplary.

(8 points)

Does notcomparescores in eachsubject,subgroup, andgrade level tothe standardsfor Acceptable,Recognized,and Exemplary.

(7 points)

Does notsummarizeCampusReport.

(0 points)Part 2:CampusGroup and CIReportSummary

Conductsdetailedcomparison of scores in eachsubject to thestandards forAcceptable,Recognized,and Exemplary.

(10 points)

Comparesscores in eachsubject,subgroup, andgrade level tothe standardsfor Acceptable,Recognized,and Exemplary.

(8 points)

Does notcomparescores in eachsubject,subgroup, andgrade level tothe standardsfor Acceptable,Recognized,and Exemplary.

(7 points)

Does not turnin this portionof assignment.

(0 points)Part 3: Multi- Year HistoryReportSummary

Successfullynotes trendsand/or patternsin campus AEISdata.

(10 points)

Notes onetrend and/orpattern incampus AEISdata.

(8 points)

Does not notetrends and/orpatterns incampus AEISdata.

(7 points)

Does not turnin this portionof assignment.

(0 points)Part 4: AEISChartCompletion

Completes allapplicable datain three AEISComparisonCharts.

(10 points)

Completes allapplicable datain two AEISComparisonCharts.

(8 points)

Completes allapplicable datain one AEISComparisonChart.

(7 points)

Does not turnin this portionof assignment.

(0 points)Part 5: Areaof Strength

Identifies onearea of campusIdentifies onearea of campusIdentifies onearea of campusDoes not turnin this portion

Lamar University2 of 18

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *