After Postmodernism Reconstructing Ideology Critique Essay

  • Ankersmit, F. (1992). De grondslagenvijandige politieke filosofie van Richard Rorty. In R. Boomkens (Red.),De asceet, de tolk en de verteller, (pp. 58–75) Amsterdam: Stichting voor Filosofies Onderzoek/Krisis.Google Scholar

  • Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H.A. (1991).Postmodern education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Baacke, D., Frank, A., Frese, J., & Nonne, F. (Eds.). (1985).Am ende — Postmodern? Next wave in der pädagogik. Weinheim & München: Juventa.Google Scholar

  • Barber, B. (1988).The conquest of politics. Liberal philosophy in democratic times Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Beck, C. (1994). Postmodernism, pedagogy, and philosophy of education. In A. Thompson (Ed.),Philosopyh of education 1993, (pp. 1–13). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1992).The new constellation. The ethical-politcal horizons of modernity-postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Beyer, L.E., & Liston, D.P. (1992). Discourse or moral action? A critique of postmodernism.Educational Theory,42, 371–393.Google Scholar

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (1994a). Education as practical intersubjectivity. Towards a critical-pragmaticunderstanding of education.Educational Theory,44, 299–317.Google Scholar

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (1994b). Pragmatism as a pedagogy of communicative action.Studies in Philosophy and Education,13, 273–290.Google Scholar

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (in press). Education/Communication: The two faces of communicative pedagogy. In A. Neiman (Ed.),Philosophy of education 1995. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar

  • Braidotti, R. (1988). De politiek van de ontologische differentie.Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies,9, 375–389.Google Scholar

  • Braidotti, R. (1992). Van subject veranderen. Metafysica en metabolisme.Krisis, (no. 46), 53–60.Google Scholar

  • Brodkey, L. (1987). Postmodern pedagogy for progressive educators.Journal of Education,169, 138–143.Google Scholar

  • Brooker, P. (Ed.). (1992).Modernism/Postmodernism. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Burbules, N.C. (1993).Dialogue in teaching. Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Burbules, N.C., & Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation.Harvard Educational Review,61, 393–416.Google Scholar

  • Cherryholmes, C. (1988).Power and criticism. Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Dewey, J. (1895). Plan of organization of the university primary school. InJohn Dewey, The early works, 1882–1898. Volume 5: 1895–1898, (pp. 223–243). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

  • Di Stefano, C. (1990). Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity, and postmodernism. In L.J. Nicholson (Ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, (pp. 63–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Donald, J. (1992).Sentimental education. Schooling popular culture and the regulation of liberty. London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Doll, W.E., Jr. (1993).A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Dreyfus, H.L., & Rabinow, P. (1983).Michel Foucalt. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics., (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Elshtain, J.B. (1992). Don't be cruel: Reflections on Rortyian liberalism. In D.W. Conway & J.E. Seery (Eds.),The politics of irony. Essays in selfbetrayal, (pp. 199–217). New York: Martin's Press.Google Scholar

  • Flax, J., (1987a). Postmodernism and gender relations in ferminist theory.Signs: Journal of women in culture and society,12, 621–643.Google Scholar

  • Flax, J. (1987b). Re-membering the Selves: Is the repressed gendered?Michigan Quarterly Review,26, 92–110.Google Scholar

  • Fraser, N., & Nicholson, L. (1989). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp 83–104). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fritzman, J.M. (1990). Lyotard's paralogy and Rorty's pluralism: Their differences and pedagogical implications.Educational Theory,40, 371–380.Google Scholar

  • Giroux, H.A. (Ed.) (1991).Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

  • Giroux, H.A. (1992):Border crossings. Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Gore, J.M. (1993).The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Habermas: Questions and counterquestions.Praxis International,4, 229–249.Google Scholar

  • Habermas, J. (1985).Die neuen unübersichtlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

  • Harding, S. (1986).The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hebdige, D. (1986). Postmodernism and “The Other Side”.Journal of Communication Inquiry,10, 78–99.Google Scholar

  • Heyting, F. (1992). De relativiteit van opvoedkundige theorievorming.Comenius,12, 172–195.Google Scholar

  • hooks, b. (1984).Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar

  • Huyssen, A. (1986).After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, F. (1991).Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kanpol, B. (1992). Postmodernism in education revisited: Similarities within differences and the democratic imaginary.Educational Theory,42, 217–229.Google Scholar

  • Kiziltan, M.Ü., Bain, W.J., & Cañizares, M. (1990). Postmodern conditions: Rethinking public education.Educational Theory,40, 351–369.Google Scholar

  • Laclau, E. (1989). Politics and the limits of modernity. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp. 63–82). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lather, P. (1991).Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1979).La condition postmoderne. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1983).Le différend. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

  • Masschelein, J. (1991a). Die ergebnislose und funktionslose erziehung.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,37, 65–80.Google Scholar

  • Masschelein, J. (1991b).Kommunikatives handeln und pädagogischs handeln. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Masschelein, J. (1992). Wandel der oeffentlichkeit und das problem der identität.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 28, 59–75.Google Scholar

  • McClure, K. (1992). On the subject of rights: Pluralism, plurality and political identity. In C. Mouffe, (Ed.),Dimensions of radical democracy, (pp. 108–127). London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • McLaren, P. (1986). Review Article—Postmodernity and the death of politics: A Brazilian perspective.Educational Theory,36, 389–401.Google Scholar

  • McLaren, P. (1991). Schooling the postmodern body: Critical pedagogy and the politics of enfleshment. In H.A. Giroux (Ed.),Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics, (pp. 144–173). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

  • McLaren, P. (in press). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Towards a pedagogy of resistance and transformation.Cultural Studies.Google Scholar

  • McLaren, P., & Hammer, R. (1989). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern challenge: Towards a critical postmodernist pedagogy of liberation.Educational Foundations,3, 29–62.Google Scholar

  • Miedema, S. (1992). The end of pedagogy? A plea for concrete utopian acting and thinking.Phenomenologgy and Pedagogy,10, 28–37.Google Scholar

  • Miedema, S. (1994). Ethnizität, pluralität und weltbürgerschaft. In H. Sünker, D. Timmerman, & F.-U. Kolbe (Hrsg.),Bildung, gesellschaft, soziale ungleichkeit, (pp. 199–225). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

  • Mollenhauer, J. (1972).Theorieën zum erziehungsprozess. München: Juventa.Google Scholar

  • Mongardini, C. (1992). The ideology of postmodernity.Theory, Culture & Society,9, 55–65.Google Scholar

  • Morrow, R.A., & Torres, C.A. (1994). Education and the reproduction of class, gender, and race: Responding to the postmodern challenge.Educational Theory,44, 43–61.Google Scholar

  • Mouffe, C. (1989). Radical democracy: Modern or postmodern. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp. 31–45). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press.Google Scholar

  • Mouffe, C. (1992a). Democratic politics today. In C. Mouffe (Ed.),Dimensions of radical democracy, (pp. 1–16). London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Mouffe, C. (1992b). Democratic citizenship and the political community. In C. Mouffe (Ed.),Dimensions of radical democracy, (pp. 225–239). London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Nicholson, C. (1989). Postmodernism, feminism, and education: The need for solidarity.Educational Theory,39, 197–205.Google Scholar

  • Nicholson, L.J. (Ed.). (1990).Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Oelkers, J. (1987). Die wiederkehr der postmoderne. Pädagogische reflexionen zum neunen fin de siècle.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,33, 21–40.Google Scholar

  • Pels, D. (1992). Kennispolitiek. Een gebruiksaanwijzing voor Foucault.Kennis en Methode,16, 39–62.Google Scholar

  • Pinar, W.F., & Reynolds, W.M. (Eds.). (1992).Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Poster, M. (1989).Critical theory and poststructuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Prins, B. (1992). Passie en paradox van het vrouwelijk subject.Krisis,12, 49–52.Google Scholar

  • Rang, A. (1988).Pedagogiek en moderniteit. Nijmegen: Sun.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1980).Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of pragmatism (Essays: 1972–1980). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1985). Solidarity or objectivity? In J. Rajchman, & C. West (Eds.),Post-analytic philosophy, (pp. 3–19). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1989).Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1990). The dangers of over-philosophication—Reply to Arcilla and Nicholson.Educational Theory,40, 41–44.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1991a).Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Philosphical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1991b).Essays on Heidegger and others. Philosophical Papers Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, R. (1992): Robustness: A Reply to Jean Bethke Elshtain. In D.W. Conway & J.E. Seery (Eds.),Politics of irony. Essays in self-betrayal, (pp. 219–223). New York: Martin's Press.Google Scholar

  • Ross, A. (Ed.) (1989a).Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ross, A. (1989b). Introduction. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp. vii-xviii). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schleiermacher, F.D. (1983/1984). In E. von Weniger & T. Schulze (Eds.),Pädagogische schriften (2 Bde.). Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, C. (1992).Multiculturalism and “The politics of recognition”. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Westbrook, R.B. (1991).John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Young, R. (1990).A critical theory of education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Некорректный ввод только ускорит процесс разрушения. Два некорректных ввода - и шифр навсегда захлопнется от нас на замок. Тогда всему придет конец. Директор нахмурился и повернулся к экрану. - Мистер Беккер, я был не прав.

    0 comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *